Every ingredient is checked three ways – on its own, against the rest of the formula, and against your allergies and preferences.
| Manual research | Scanner appsYuka · Think Dirty · EWG · INCI Beauty | Bestie | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personalized to you | Yes, but unaided | No — filters and alerts only, the score never changes | Yes |
| Conflicts across your whole routine | No | None — no app scores a product against the rest of your shelf | Yes |
| Traceable to the source | DIY | Named, not linked | Linked per flag |
| Works on a product they've never seen | 15–20+ min | Hours to a month | Seconds |
EWG states its ratings "do not account for the level of exposure or individual susceptibility." Not one of the four personalizes its score to the person holding the phone.
Think Dirty, EWG Premium and INCI Beauty all let you flag ingredients to avoid. Each one hides products and prints an alert. None of them recomputes the score.
Yuka, Think Dirty and INCI Beauty each exclude concentration by stated policy. 79% of Society of Toxicology members surveyed said EWG overstates risk. Dose is the wedge.
Yuka and EWG genuinely cite: 30+ sources on a well-studied ingredient. But no hyperlinks, no DOIs, and empty source lists across the long tail. Ours resolves to the study in two taps.
Yuka runs ~85 scans/sec at 95%+ recognition on 2M SKUs. Do not attack that. Attack the long tail: Think Dirty batches unknown products monthly, INCI Beauty wastes 1 photo in 4.